Beyond Apple: NIAC Calls on Tech Companies To Lift Internet Communications Blockade
The National Iranian American Council and a broad coalition of organizations called today on tech companies including Google, Yahoo, and Go Daddy to stop blocking the Iranian people from accessing Internet communications tools.
Washington, DC – The National Iranian American Council and a broad coalition of organizations called today on tech companies including Google, Yahoo, and Go Daddy to stop blocking the Iranian people from accessing Internet communications tools.
In the wake of Iran’s 2009 protests and the Arab awakening, social media and the Internet have been recognized as vital tools for enabling freedom of speech and the free flow of information within repressive countries. But while President Obama has spoken out against Iran’s “electronic curtain” and has taken steps to exempt basic Internet communication tools from broad sanctions against Iran and other sanctioned countries, many technology companies have failed to respond accordingly and make basic communications software and tools available to ordinary Iranians.
In addition to NIAC, the letter was signed by organizations supporting human rights, Internet freedom and focused on other sanctioned countries including Syria and Cuba. The signees are: Electronic Frontier Foundation, Access, Center for Rights/Fight for the Future, Council of the Americas, Cuba Study Group, International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, New America’s Open Internet Tools Project, New America’s Open Technology Institute, Syrian American Council, The Tor Project, United4Iran, and Witness.
The full letter, as well as a chart of blocked services, is below or as a PDF:
Mr. Warren Adelman, Chief Executive Officer, Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC.
Mr. Joseph Alhadeff, Vice President for Global Public Policy, Oracle Corporation
Mr. Bob Boorstin, Director of Corporate and Policy Communication, Google Inc.
Mr. Tim Cook, Chief Executive Officer, Apple Inc.
Mr. Dave DeWalt, President and Chief Executive Officer, McAfee Inc.
Ms. Carol DiBattiste, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Geeknet, Inc.
Mr. Jace Johnson, Vice President Government Affairs & Public Policy, Adobe Systems
Mr. Lanham Napier, President & Chief Executive Officer, Rackspace, US Inc.
Ms. Ebele Okobi. Director Business & Human Rights Program, Yahoo! Inc.
Mr. J.R. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, AVG Technologies
Ms. Louisa Terrell, Director of Public Policy, Facebook, Inc.
CC: Ms. Susan Morgan, Executive Director, Global Network Initiative
Dear Sir or Madam,
While American and European companies provide unmatched platforms for free expression and citizen journalism, misapplications of export regulations have created a chilling effect on the free flow of information to those living under repressive regimes. We are writing to urge you to take necessary steps to ensure important Internet communication services provided by your companies are not unnecessarily blocked for individuals in sanctioned countries.
In places such as Iran, Cuba, Sudan and Syria, online media has emerged as a sanctuary to debate ideas, report human rights violations, and support women’s rights. Increasingly, these communities have faced the denial of essential services by your companies, stifling opportunities to affect social and political change, as activists struggle to restore the means they rely on to communicate freely and support their operations.
As technology and business leaders, your companies bear the unique obligation to establish forward-thinking industry standards on responsible business policies, procedures and practices. While we understand there are fears about running afoul of the complex legal structure of sanctions regimes, civil society’s voice is stifled when access to the Internet is blocked without cause. We are confident that providing services to the public of embargoed countries can be accomplished without peripherally exposing good-faith actors to new liabilities or undue legal hurdles. Where constructive steps have been taken to expand product availability, such as Google Chrome in Syria, this progress has been met with wide public support, positive media attention and government encouragement.
While sanctions regulations limit direct economic transactions with embargoed entities, recent changes to Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) programs, such as the revisions made on March 8, 2010, provide exemptions for the export of ‘services and software incident to the exchange of personal communications over the Internet.’ On several occasions since, including the interpretive guidance and favorable licensing policy issued March 20, 2012, President Obama, Secretary Clinton and Congress have reiterated their political and material support for securing the Internet as a mechanism to promote human rights abroad.
In spite of these legal allowances, the publics of sanctioned countries continue to be denied access to the basic tools and platforms necessary for communicating safely and securely online. While civil society and governments foster the development of technology to protect Internet users, this continued restriction of access facilitates authoritarian governments in the repression of their citizens’ fundamental freedoms.
When users are unable to access content hosting, instant messaging, development tools, antivirus products, Java, Flash or document readers, they are either hindered in their ability to communicate on the Internet in the same way as their peers, or they turn to untrustworthy sources. Blanket restrictions imposed on advertising content and languages severely constrain the ability of external parties to sustain their operations and connect to isolated, at-risk populations. Denied these resources, users are forced to browse and participate on a limited and unsafe Internet, exposed to regime surveillance, censorship and hacking.
In the face of such pressing need, we call on you to:
1. End the unnecessary blocking of services for the public of sanctioned countries;
2. Apply for export licenses where incidental transactions create potential liability concerns;
3. Disclose which services are restricted based on location or language, and the reasons for doing so;
4. Engage with civil society to identify policies and regulations that create impediments to supporting users under political duress.
Chart of Denied Services