Menu Content/Inhalt
An Iranian-American
Voice in Washington DC!
Home arrow News arrow US-Iran News arrow House Resolution Highlights Debate over Interpretation of Ahmadinejad Comments
facts

NIAC Newsletter


HTML Text

Donate to NIAC!

Enter Amount:

$

Upcoming Events

January 30, 2010

Civic Participation Workshop

Moore, Oklahoma

February 20, 2010

Civic Participation Workshop

Philadelphia, PA


Facebook

facebook

niacINsight

Beltway insights for the Iranian-American community

Login






Lost Password?
House Resolution Highlights Debate over Interpretation of Ahmadinejad Comments
Written by Andrew Clayton   
Tuesday, 19 June 2007
ImageThe House of Representatives considered House Concurrent Resolution 21 yesterday, which calls on the UN Security Council to “charge Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide and the United Nations Charter because of his calls for the destruction of Israel.” Discussion of the bill, sponsored by Representative Steven Rothman (D-NJ), highlighted the ongoing debate concerning interpretation of various comments made by Ahmadinejad.

 

On the House floor, Rothman described Ahmadinejad as a “twisted, backward lunatic who has the “stated goal of acquiring nuclear weapons to use to carry out his homicidal, genocidal, lunatic delusions of wiping out the State of Israel.” Rothman cited three quotes from Ahmadinejad as grounds for sponsoring the bill. Various other Representatives expressed support for the bill, including Ros-Lehtinen, who claimed that “Iran’s rulers actively seek a world of oppression, of destruction, of war.”

Despite overwhelming support for the bill, Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) voiced concerns over the interpretations of Ahmadinejad’s comments that were used in the resolution. For example, Kucinich took issue with the interpretation of Ahmadinejad’s October 2005 speech, in which he has been quoted as demanding that “
Israel be wiped off the map.”

Kucinich cited an alternative interpretation from the New York Times, which fully translated the text as saying: “The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the pages of time.” Kucinich’s key contention concerned the omission of the word “regime” in the first translation, stating that “what Ahmadinejad is calling for is regime change” rather than the genocide of an entire religion or ethnic group. Kucinich cited New York Times’ interpretations of the other two quotes, again arguing that Ahmadinejad was referring to the Israeli regime.

Explaining his justification for introducing these interpretations into the debate, Kucinich expressed a desire to prevent faulty information from leading to poor policy. Kucinich cited faulty information leading up to the Iraq war as grounds to verify the veracity of information now and in the future. “I don’t think it is an unreasonable request that we look at exactly what this person said so we’ll know what the appropriate course of action is to take,” Kucinich added.

Though a voice vote was taken yesterday, Ros-Lehtinen asked for a count of Yeas and Nays. That vote is expected to take place today.


 
< Prev   Next >